Hmm

Something weird is going on…

I was looking at the data points vs. the convolution that I calculated and got this:

But in looking at the graph that you gave me it looked rather sparse comparatively… And indeed there are far more Keck points than show up. I'm looking into what's going on here…

Running the same code on order 67 looks like it's correct (at least as far as number of points are concerned) over a random 10 Angstrom section :

page revision: 5, last edited: 09 Jan 2008 04:16